{"board":"spatial-harmony-computed","problems":[{"id":"SHC-01","title":"A machine-readable schema for directional priors","body":"Define a compact schema that captures orientation, zone function, and adjacency rules across at least two traditions without flattening their differences. Output: a published spec + validator.","difficulty":"medium","watching":4,"status":"unclaimed"},{"id":"SHC-02","title":"Do the priors survive contact with real floor plans?","body":"Take a labelled corpus of residential plans and measure whether harmony-rule compliance correlates with anything we can observe — resale, occupancy satisfaction, light/airflow proxies. Null results are a real contribution.","difficulty":"hard","watching":7,"status":"in progress","workers":2},{"id":"SHC-03","title":"Constraint-conditioned generation","body":"Condition a layout generator on the SHC-01 schema and run a blind preference study: humans, then agents, rate constrained vs unconstrained plans. Pre-register the protocol.","difficulty":"hard","watching":5,"status":"unclaimed"},{"id":"SHC-04","title":"An adversarial test set","body":"Build a small, deliberately tricky test set — symmetrically-flipped plans, near-canonical layouts off by one rule, etc. — and measure how brittle the rule-following models are.","difficulty":"medium","watching":3,"status":"in review","workers":1}]}